Obama Hits Lowest Approval Mark Since Taking Office

February 9, 2010

Obama Hits Lowest Approval Mark Since Taking Office

February 8, 2010 12:58 PM

Independent voters see Pres. Obama in a negative light by a nearly 2-1 margin, according to a new Marist College survey, while almost half of voters say he has failed to meet their expectations.

The poll, conducted Feb. 1-3, showed just 44% of registered voters approving of Obama’s job as president. 47% disapprove. But among indie voters, Obama’s approval rating sits at a terrible 29%, while his disapproval rating is at 57%.

Obama’s 44% job approval rating is the lowest he has scored in any non-internet poll since moving into the WH, according to a review of data compiled by Pollster.com.

 Excerpted from:

http://hotlineoncall.nationaljournal.com/archives/2010/02/obama_hits_lowe.php


MSNBC newscaster calls Obama on The Big Lie about TARP funding; reveals banks given access to 23.7 TRILLION TAXPAYER DOLLARS — not $700 Billion!

February 3, 2010


Obama lectures nation to “tighten your belts” while he enjoys Hawaiian vacations and Paris shopping trips with his entire family in tow (on the taxpayer’s dime, of course)…

February 3, 2010

Obama’s right.  People should watch their spending during tough times.

The problem is, he doesn’t practice what he preaches. 

First, he spends trillions of dollars of taxpayer’s money on boondoggles to “stimulate the economy.”

Then, while the rest of the nation is suffering financially, he hypocritically jets off to Paris for a weekend of “sightseeing and shopping” with his wife, mother-in-law and daughters, (at taxpayer’s expense, of course), and takes expensive Hawaiian vacations in December to escape the harsh winter Washington D.C. cold. 

The last thing anyone wants to hear from the Obamas is a lecture on belt-tightening, when it is his absurd “spend your way out of debt” economic policies that have caused the economic malaise to drag on, and the unemployment rate to skyrocket. 

This is Jimmy Carter all over again.  Jimmy finger-pointed and browbeat the American public relentlessly about spending less, driving slower, keeping their thermostats set higher in the summer and lower in the winter, and just about everything else you could imagine while his economic policies destroyed the economy.

Of course, Jimmy’s problem was that he had more teeth than brains.  Obama’s problem is that he’s a two-faced hypocrite who disdains the people he rules over, as well as the nation itself.

Like his peer, Queen Nancy Pelosi, who has spent $101,000 of taxpayer money on in-flight liquor and food over the last two years (nearly $1,000 a week!), Obama’s imperial reign is the most expensive in history. 

Lectures from the likes of him are simply not wanted.

– Spencer

President Obama Again Criticizes Trips to Las Vegas

http://www.lasvegasnow.com/Global/story.asp?S=11922024

Posted: Feb 02, 2010 2:59 PM PST

President Obama is catching heat from Nevada lawmakers and business leaders regarding his comments Tuesday criticizing trips to Las Vegas.

During the president’s town hall meeting in Nashua, New Hampshire, he discussed the need to curb spending during tough economic times.  “When times are tough, you tighten your belts,” the president said. “You don’t go buying a boat when you can barely pay your mortgage. You don’t blow a bunch of cash on Vegas when you’re trying to save for college.”

The president’s comments come nearly a year after he criticized companies that received federal money for taking corporate junkets to Las Vegas. “You can’t go take that trip to Las Vegas or go down to the Super Bowl on taxpayers’ dime,” he said at the time. Local business leaders say Nevada tourism suffered last year in part because companies canceled trips to Las Vegas in the wake of the president’s comments.

His statement Tuesday drew sharp criticism from Nevada lawmakers. “The President needs to lay off Las Vegas and stop making it the poster child for where people shouldn’t be spending their money,” said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, a Democrat.

“Las Vegas is suffering through one of the highest unemployment rates in the country, and we cannot afford for the President to bring us down any further,” added Republican Senator John Ensign.

“Nevada has one of the most distressed economies in the country, and the President has done little to focus on job creation over the past year.  Discouraging people from coming to our state to make a political point adds insult to injury,” said Republican Congressman Dean Heller.


Obama’s “backdoor taxes” to hit middle class hard

February 2, 2010

While our mandingo man-god focuses publicly on his new soak-the-rich tax proposals, what he doesn’t tell the American public is how his tax plan will raise taxes on middle class families by allowing Bush-era tax breaks for the middle class to expire. 

In essence, the Obama-messiah can lie to the public with a straight face and claim he’s not “raising taxes” on the middle class, because technically, he’s not.  But he is allowing middle class tax breaks to expire. And come tax time, those expired tax breaks will hit the middle class like a freight train. 

They won’t see it coming, of course.  They’re too busy gloating over how the “rich” are being targeted for higher taxes to notice that they’re in Obama’s cross hairs too.

By the time the middle class take notice, it will be too late.   Not only will their taxes skyrocket at a time when every dollar counts, but many of them will lose their jobs as businesses are forced to cut back on expenditures in order to compensate for the extra taxes they’ll have to pay. 

YahooNews.com, a long-time Obama cheerleader, pulled this Reuters News story from their American web site (see here).  But I was able to find it on the Canadian version of YahooNews.com, as reprinted below for evidence. 

 – Spencer

Obama’s “backdoor taxes” to hit middle class hard

http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/reuters/100201/us/usreport_us_budget_backdoortaxes

Mon Feb 1, 4:09 PM

By Terri Cullen

NEW YORK (Reuters.com) –The Obama administration’s plan to cut more than $1 trillion from the deficit over the next decade relies heavily on so-called backdoor tax increases that will result in a bigger tax bill for middle-class families.

In the 2010 budget tabled by President Barack Obama on Monday, the White House wants to let billions of dollars in tax breaks expire by the end of the year — effectively a tax hike by stealth.

While the administration is focusing its proposal on eliminating tax breaks for individuals who earn $250,000 a year or more, middle-class families will face a slew of these backdoor increases.

The targeted tax provisions were enacted under the Bush administration’s Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001. Among other things, the law lowered individual tax rates, slashed taxes on capital gains and dividends, and steadily scaled back the estate tax to zero in 2010.

If the provisions are allowed to expire on December 31, the top-tier personal income tax rate will rise to 39.6 percent from 35 percent. But lower-income families will pay more as well: the 25 percent tax bracket will revert back to 28 percent; the 28 percent bracket will increase to 31 percent; and the 33 percent bracket will increase to 36 percent. The special 10 percent bracket is eliminated.

Investors will pay more on their earnings next year as well, with the tax on dividends jumping to 39.6 percent from 15 percent and the capital-gains tax increasing to 20 percent from 15 percent. The estate tax is eliminated this year, but it will return in 2011 — though there has been talk about reinstating the death tax sooner.

Millions of middle-class households already may be facing higher taxes in 2010 because Congress has failed to extend tax breaks that expired on January 1, most notably a “patch” that limited the impact of the alternative minimum tax. The AMT, initially designed to prevent the very rich from avoiding income taxes, was never indexed for inflation. Now the tax is affecting millions of middle-income households, but lawmakers have been reluctant to repeal it because it has become a key source of revenue.

Without annual legislation to renew the patch this year, the AMT could affect an estimated 25 million taxpayers with incomes as low as $33,750 (or $45,000 for joint filers). Even if the patch is extended to last year’s levels, the tax will hit American families that can hardly be considered wealthy — the AMT exemption for 2009 was $46,700 for singles and $70,950 for married couples filing jointly.

Middle-class families also will find fewer tax breaks available to them in 2010 if other popular tax provisions are allowed to expire. Among them:

* Taxpayers who itemize will lose the option to deduct state sales-tax payments instead of state and local income taxes;

* The $250 teacher tax credit for classroom supplies;

* The tax deduction for up to $4,000 of college tuition and expenses;

* Individuals who don’t itemize will no longer be able to increase their standard deduction by up to $1,000 for property taxes paid;

* The first $2,400 of unemployment benefits are taxable, in 2009 that amount was tax-free.


Obama proposes $1 trillion in tax hikes on businesses…

February 2, 2010

Prepare for higher and higher prices on goods and services, as businesses are forced to raise prices in an effort to help offset $1 trillion in higher business taxes being proposed by Obama.

When will people learn that “taxing the rich” (i.e., taxing businesses and businessmen) only hurts the poor and middle class.  They end up paying more for everything from food, gas, electricity, water, and all basic necessities, because businesses are forced to pass the higher taxes onto the consumer.  

Plus, businesses are forced to lay off workers and cut production in order to save money.

But hey, consumers think Obama is only “soaking the rich.”  They think that’s only “fair.” 

We seem to go through this two or three times in every generation.  And it is only when prices for all goods and services finally become so unbearable that people start to see the light, vote out the high taxers, and elect politicians who will lower the tax burden on businesses, giving them the capital they need to hire more workers, raise worker pay, and produce at competitive prices.

Until then, you’d better start pinching your pennies, because high prices are on their way, courtesy of the Obama-messiah!

– Spencer

Obama proposes $1 trillion in tax hikes on businesses in budget

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35185592/ns/business-personal_finance/

Wealthy, businesses would pay about $1 trillion more

WASHINGTON – While President Barack Obama is proposing to cut some taxes for companies that hire workers, his budget would raise a host of other taxes on businesses and wealthy individuals.

The budget proposal released Monday would extend Obama’s signature Making Work Pay tax credit — $400 for individuals, $800 for a couple filing jointly — through 2011. But it would also impose nearly $1 trillion in higher taxes on couples making more than $250,000 and individuals making more than $200,000 by not renewing tax cuts enacted under former President George W. Bush. Obama would extend Bush-era tax cuts for families and individuals making less.


Another Obama nominee said caught lying between her teeth (this time, to Congress)…

January 30, 2010

Obama nominee may have lied to Congress, but she may slip through on Monday before Scott Brown is seated

 Online Opinion Editor

01/30/10 1:07 PM EST

(Opinion)  Patricia Smith, President Obama’s nominee for Solicitor of Labor, appears to have lied to Congress, according to e-mails released from during her tenure as Commissioner of the New York State Labor Department. As Daniel Halper explains over at The Weekly Standard, Smith has lied about her involvement with the Wage and Hour Watch program — five times telling senators that she had no intention to expand the program to the entire state (leaving it localized in New York City), but later emails and other documents revealed that she did indeed plan to expand the program throughout the entire state of New York.

Senate Labor ranking member Mike Enzi, R-Wyo., has asked that Smith’s nomination be withdrawn.

Halper’s post reproduces two memos on Smith that Republicans are circulating on Capitol Hill.  The Wage Watch program was an effort to deputize unions to detect illegal employment practices — for example, by confronting and interviewing employees as they leave work, or even while they are on the job.

Beyond the issue of the expansion of Wage Watch, Smith also appears to have misled Congress as regards the involvement of outside labor groups in developing the program. She had been asked about this during her confirmation hearing by Sen. Richard Burr, R-N.C.:

Senator Burr. But you reached out to individuals and groups to help craft the specifics of—-

Ms. Smith. Actually, no, Senator, we did not. This was an internally crafted group. It was only after we sat down and crafted it ourselves that we reached out to groups to see if they would be interested.

But the e-mails obtained through New York’s Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) suggest otherwise. Outside groups were being consulted as early as April 2008, and played a key role in developing the program. Smith herself was copied on e-mails discussing the program with these groups as early as November 2008. The program was announced publicly in January 2009, and Enzi’s memo contends that the businesses affected weren’t even allowed a meeting with Smith until March.

Smith’s actions with respect to this program seem to show she has a heavy bias toward labor and against business — no big surprise, perhaps, considering who is appointing her. But why she would mislead or even directly lie to Congress about any of this is a bit odd. Even when given the opportunity to revise her testimony in written questions, Smith stuck to a story that does not seem consistent with the paper-trail.

On Monday, Smith will get a cloture vote in the Senate. With Scott Brown waiting at least another week to be seated in the Senate, there is a chance her nomination will slide right through.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/Senators-demand-Obama-withdraw-labor-nominee-83153287.html?utm_source=feedburner+BeltwayConfidential&utm_medium=feed+Beltway+Confidential&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+BeltwayConfidential+%28Beltway+Confidential%29&utm_content=FaceBook


Obama uses State of Union address to promote homosexuals in military…

January 28, 2010

Hey, what else did you expect from the guy whose White House Christmas tree featured a photo of a transvestite…whose latest Commerce Dept. appointee is a he-she (er…ah…pardon me…a transgendered person)…and whose “safe schools” czar runs an organization that taught school children how to “fist” each other and perform oral sex on each other during homosexual sex?

With the panoply of very serious problems now faced by our nation, this is what our great mandingo man-god deems to be so important it had to be included in the State of the Union address.  Just goes to show you where his mind, morals and priorities are.

Do note in the below article that the entire Democrat Congress stood up and gave Obama a standing ovation when he made his pronouncement on ending the ban on gays in the military during his State of the Union speech. 

Yes, it’s time to throw the whole bunch out before the White House is so stained by their presence that we can’t get rid of it.

Yes, we can!  Yes, we can!  Yes, we can!  In November, 2010!

– Spencer

Obama: Repeal ban on gays in military

Democratic allies, GOP foes both respond with criticism
The Associated Press
updated 7:59 p.m. PT, Wed., Jan. 27, 2010

WASHINGTON – Reaching out to a skeptical gay community, President Barack Obama on Wednesday urged Congress to repeal the ban on gays and lesbians serving openly in the military, but neither made a commitment to suspend the practice in the interim nor issued a deadline.

Obama’s reference to the so-called “don’t ask, don’t tell” practice took only 32 words of his State of the Union address, but drew criticism from Democratic allies and Republican opponents alike. It also underscored the challenge Obama faces, not just with Congress but also with the Pentagon, where some top officials have been strident in their support for the Clinton-era policy.

“This year, I will work with Congress and our military to finally repeal the law that denies gay Americans the right to serve the country they love because of who they are,” Obama said in prepared remarks.

The statement drew a standing ovation from Congress and from Defense Secretary Robert Gates, but it fell short for gay activists.

URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35113100/ns/politics-white_house/

MSN Privacy . Legal

© 2010 MSNBC.com

Obama mentions self 132 times in single speech; mentions taxpayers twice…

January 27, 2010

“It’s not about me,” says Obama.  Hmmm….


Another broken Obama promise: “I will finally end the abuse of no-bid contracts once and for all”

January 26, 2010

By Michelle Malkin  •  January 25, 2010 12:26 PM

No corruption-scented no-bid contracts…except for Barack Obama’s own cronies, that is.  James Rosen at FNC has the scoop:

The Obama administration this month awarded a $25 million federal contract for work in Afghanistan to a company owned by a prominent Democratic campaign contributor without entertaining competitive bids, Fox News has learned.

Despite President Obama’s long history of criticizing the Bush administration for “sweetheart deals” with favored contractors, the Obama administration this month awarded a $25 million federal contract for work in Afghanistan to a company owned by a Democratic campaign contributor without entertaining competitive bids, Fox News has learned.

The contract, awarded on Jan. 4 to Checchi & Company Consulting, Inc., a Washington-based firm owned by economist and Democratic donor Vincent V. Checchi, will pay the firm $24,673,427 to provide “rule of law stabilization services” in war-torn Afghanistan.

A synopsis of the contract published on the USAID Web site says Checchi & Company will “train the next generation of legal professionals” throughout the Afghan provinces and thereby “develop the capacity of Afghanistan’s justice system to be accessible, reliable, and fair.”

The legality of the arrangement as a “sole source,” or no-bid, contract was made possible by virtue of a waiver signed by the USAID administrator. “They cancelled the open bid on this when they came to power earlier this year,” a source familiar with the federal contracting process told Fox News.

“That’s kind of weird,” said another source, who has worked on “rule of law” issues in both Afghanistan and Iraq, about the no-bid contract to Checchi & Company. “There’s lots of companies and non-governmental organizations that do this sort of work.”

Contacted by Fox News, Checchi confirmed that his company had indeed received the nearly $25 million contract but declined to say why it had been awarded on a no-bid basis, referring a reporter to USAID.

Asked if he or his firm had been aware that the contract was awarded without competitive bids, Checchi replied: “After it was awarded to us, sure. Before, we had no idea.”

Checchi has donated to Team Obama, MoveOn, the DNC, and ActBlue, among other left-wing entities.

Flashback March 2009:

Obama promises to limit no-bid contracts
Says $40 billion could be saved every year

WASHINGTON – President Obama ordered an overhaul yesterday of the way the US government awards defense and other contracts, saying that more competition is needed to drive down costs and declaring that “the days of giving government contractors a blank check are over.”

Obama joined Senator John McCain, his Republican presidential campaign rival, and other congressional figures to promise taxpayers savings of as much as $40 billion a year, in part by limiting no-bid contracts.

Even in good economic times, contracting reform would be overdue in Washington, Obama said, but with the recession, “It’s time for this waste and inefficiency to end. It’s time for a government that only invests in what works.”

The president announced an executive memorandum that directs his budget director, Peter Orszag, to work with Cabinet and agency officials to come up by July 1 with a way to review existing contracts for waste or fraud.

By the end of September, Orszag is to come up with new rules designed to make it more difficult for contractors to cheat taxpayers by strengthening oversight and ending unnecessary no-bid contracts and “cost-plus” contracts that allow price tags to escalate. The new rules would also make some half-trillion dollars in federal contracts each year more accessible to independent contractors.


Obama uses teleprompter to address 6th grade class…

January 25, 2010